Los Angeles Lewd Conduct Attorney | Law Offices of Jeff Voll

Actual Case #1 represented by Attorney Jeff Voll

In People v. Jose O. - Case No 3PN05821, my client was accused of lewd conduct and indecent exposure. The prosecutor wanted him to register as a sex offender for life. The allegation was that he often parked his car on a side street in Van Nuys where this attractive young lady would walk by everyday. One day, the young lady looked inside the vehicle he was driving and saw him masturbating as he was looking at her walk by. When he noticed her looking at him pulling on his manhood he drove off. The young lady was able to "partially" see his license plate and was "almost certain" as to the make and model of his car. The cops did a DMV search of the partial license plate information and came up with a make and model of a vehicle "matching the description" that the lady observed. The cops did a six-pack photo line-up of the picture of the registered driver attached to the vehicle "matching the description" and based on the lady witness pointing out a photo that looked like the guy jerking off in his car they arrested my client. The DA refused to let this case go. They refused to reason with me. They refused to see that this case was weak from a circumstantial stand point. They demanded we plead straight up to the charge and that my client who had no record register as a sex offender for life. They got what they deserved. Outcome: Not guilty verdict all charges.

Actual Case #2 represented by Attorney Jeff Voll

In the case of In Re K.A. – Inglewood Juvenile Case No. YJ39686, I represented a minor accused of sexual crimes against another minor at his school. With proper investigation and filing of defense motions, the case was dismissed with prejudice, meaning the charges can never be brought again. Due to law enforcement stripping him naked and taking a buccal swab to his entire body and shackling him in handcuffs in front of the entire student body of his middle school, I made my minor client promise that he would become a defense lawyer when he graduated College. Outcome: Case Dismissed.

Actual Case #3 represented by Attorney Jeff Voll

In People v. David H. - Case No. BA481648, my client was accused of the very serious sex crimes of (1) human trafficking of a female who was a minor for the purposes of pimping her and (2) two counts of lewd and lascivious acts with a minor. These charges carried with them a Maximum 18 years of Prison. The Detective had a bone to pick, no pun intended, with my client and when my client was in jail awaiting arraignment, the Detective made a personal visit to my client and through the jail bars in his cell, told my client "I told you I was going to get you." Well my client bailed out of jail and never set foot back in jail/prison and is today a free man. You see, the "victim" in this case WAS a street walking prostitute who walked tracks all over the Country. When law enforcement interviewed her about my client "pimping her" she would refer to my client as her boyfriend and then proceed to talk about the little blue extraterrestrials that were circling right above her inside L. Ron Hubbard's invisible spaceship that was speeding toward earth for a Dianetics reunion at their Celebrity Center in Hollywood. The case was dismissed after about 6 months of me putting up a fight.

Actual Case #4 represented by Attorney Jeff Voll

Actual Case #5 represented by Attorney Jeff Voll

In People v. F.H. - Case No. 1CJ03293-01, my client was charged with 4 counts of sexual molestation of a minor and 4 counts of lewd conduct of a minor. The alleged victims were his kids! This case was filed as a misdemeanor because the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office saw the B.S. on the wall in bright neon paint that these were false allegations so they referred it to the Los Angeles City Attorney's Office who only filed misdemeanors. It was clear from the police report that the ex-wife mother of the kids was a life time subscriber to the old adage "hell hath no fury like a woman's scorn." You see, because they were divorcing, Mom wanted sole custody of the kids, so the Mom made her kids lie about my client touching them because Mom is a POS who forced her kids to lie so my client would not get custody. I mean this turd actually made her minor son and daughter lie to the police while forcing them to talk about their private parts and so forth. Yes, this happens. And it happens often. This is not the first time someone has fabricated a tale and used the criminal justice system against an innocent party. Just take me as the defendant and putos John, David and Matt etc... for example. Anyway, the allegations she made were completely untrue. It was clear that she was full of excrement. Nevertheless, the City Attorney prosecutor (who has quite a reputation on the World Wide Web) filed 4 counts of sexual molestation of a minor and 4 counts of lewd conduct of a minor against my client which would mean if he was convicted he would have to register as a sex offender for life. After my Private Investigator got a chance to interview the kids, the prosecutor threw in towel. This case was clearly such bullshit that I could not wait for jury trial. Outcome: Case Dismissed.

Actual Case #6 represented by Attorney Jeff Voll

In People v. J.A. - Case No. FVI21002809, my client was charged with 3 sex crimes counts: 1 count of continuous sexual abuse of a minor under 14 years of age, 1 count of lewd conduct of a minor under 14 and 1 count of lewd conduct with a 14 year old. The alleged victims were my client's great grandchildren! This case was filed as a Life in Prison felony by the San Bernardino County District Attorney's Office due to their being multiple "victims" and took over 2 years to fight. The trial lasted 3 weeks. It was crystal clear from the police report and associated discovery that the "victim" grandchildren were lying through their teeth and wanted to cast blame on Great Grand Dad because the youngest of the two "victims" at age 8 would like to take selfies of her vagina using great grand dad's tablet phone and the oldest of the two "victims at age 16 would travel to Bakersfield 3 times overnight to get down with an adult male. So when Chile Protective Services came around to investigate these incidents, the two little skeezers for the first time, after "years of abuse," told their parents and CPS that Great Grand Dad touched them and fingered their vaginas. Both "victims" testified at trial and were caught lying on the witness stand. The oldest of the two continue to make up lies ON THE WITNESS STAND which the jury could clearly see was a fairytale. Yes, this happens. And it happens often. This is not the first time someone has fabricated a story and used the criminal justice system against an innocent party. Just take me as the defendant and turds John, David, Matt, Gary, Jefferson, Angel, Scott and Midget etc... for example. Anyway, the allegations the children made were completely untrue. It was clear that the kids were completely full of excrement. Remember, if my client was convicted he would have had to register as a sex offender for life IF he ever made it out of a Life in Prison sentence. Outcome: Jury Verdict All Counts Not Guilty!

THE LAW

The State of California takes a particularly serious stance toward the crime of "lewd or dissolute conduct." Section 647(a) of the California Penal Code criminalizes misdemeanor lewd conduct as an individual who solicits anyone to behave in or who behaves in lewd conduct in any public place or place open to the public or exposed to the public's view. Both engaging in and soliciting others to engage in such conduct is prohibited. The act of lewdness must have occurred in a place where others could or could reasonably be expected to witness it. Any such act that did or potentially could have offended others can be charged as lewd conduct.

California also penalizes "lewd conduct" as a felony. Penal Code section 288(a) states, a person who intentionally and lewdly commits any lewd act, upon or with any body part, of a child under 14 years of age, with the intent of arousing/appealing to, or satisfying the lust or sexual desires of that person or child, is guilty of a felony and will be punished with a sentence of prison for three, six, or eight years.

Penal Code section 288 (b) (1) states that any person who commits acts as in (a) above by use of force or violence or fear of bodily injury on the victim or someone else, is guilty of a felony and will be punished with a sentence of prison for 5, 8, or 10 years.

Penal Code section 288(b) (2) states that someone who is a caretaker who commits acts as in (a) above upon someone who is dependent by force or violence or fear of bodily injury on the victim or someone else is guilty of a felony and will be punished with a sentence of prison for 5, 8, or 10 years.

Penal Code section 288(c) (1) states that any person who commits an act as in (a) who intentionally and lewdly commits any lewd act, upon or with any body part, and the victim is 14 or 15 years of age, and that perpetrator is at least 10 years older than the child, is guilty and will be sentenced to State Prison for one, two, or three years, or by sentence in county jail for no more than 12 months.

Penal Code section 288(c)(2) any person who is a caretaker and commits an act as in (a) who intentionally and lewdly commits any lewd act, upon or with any body part, is guilty and will be sentenced to State Prison for one, two, or three years, or by sentence in county jail for no more than 12 months.

(f) For purposes of section (2) of subdivision (b) and section (2) of subdivision (c), these definitions apply:

(1) “Caretaker” means an owner/operator, administrator/employee, independent contractor/agent, or volunteer of any of the following facilities which provide care for elder/dependent persons:

(A) 24 four hour health facilities, (B) Clinics, (C) Home health centers, (D) Adult day health care agencies, (E) schools that assist dependent persons or elders, (F) Sheltered workplaces, (G) Camps, (H) Community care centers, (I) Respite care centers, (J) Foster homes, (K) centers for those with developmental disabilities, (L) home health centers, (M) agencies supplying in home support, (N) board and care locations, (O) any other public or private assistance centers providing health and social services to the elderly and dependent, (P) private homes.

Penal Code section 288(c)(3) defines a “Dependent person” as whether or not the person lives independently and has a physical/mental disability that substantially restricts their ability to perform daily normal activities and/or to protect their rights including age.

This applies to owners/operators, administrators/employees, independent contractors/agents, or volunteers working at these facilities and only to the extent that the individuals personally commit/conspire, aid/abet, or facilitate any prohibited act.

Paragraph (2)(b) and paragraph (2)(c) do not apply to a caretaker who is a spouse or in a domestic relationship with the dependent individual.

Possible Life Sentence

A person convicted of Penal Code section 288(a) will be imprisoned for Life in State prison with the possibility of parole if the accused inflicted bodily harm upon the accuser.

“Bodily harm” means any substantial physical injury resulting from the use of force.

Penalties for Lewd Conduct - Felony or Misdemeanor

Lewd conduct can be filed as a misdemeanor or felony charge that carries a sentence of up to 6 months in the county jail as a misdemeanor and a fine of up to $1,000.00, to as high as a Life Sentence if "multiple victims" are involved. The consequences of a misdemeanor conviction, however, can be lifelong since the prosecution has the option to ask for the defendant to be registered as a sex offender. The convict would then be marked for life and continually have to update his/her database information with the California DOJ Sex Offender Tracking Program. If, as is often the case, the charge of indecent exposure (PC 314) is also pursued and secured, sex offender registration would then be automatically part of the sentence.

Defenses Against Lewd Conduct Charges

It is often difficult to prove all elements necessary to a lewd conduct conviction, but as the stakes can be quite high, it is wise to hire an experienced criminal defense lawyer to put the odds in your favor. The prosecution must demonstrate the following facts beyond all reasonable doubt:

The defendant did, in fact, engage in acts of lewdness as defined in the state penal code.
These acts were done for the purpose of sexual gratification or arousal, of himself or others, or to intentionally offend others.
The incident took place in a public place where other people were or could easily have become present. It could also have occurred on private property if in public view, such as in front of an open door, an uncovered window, or in a yard with no/low fencing.

Common defenses designed to disprove these elements include:

No touching of private parts, as defined by California law, occurred.
Touching occurred on private property and not within the public's view.
Touching was not done for gratification, arousal, or offense but for other reasons. Some other possible reasons are: scratching an itchy groin, washing the genitals, and urination.
The defendant did not believe, nor could he have reasonably been expected to believe, that his action would be seen or that it would be thought offensive.
Police entrapment occurred. Undercover police agents carried out a sting operation and purposefully baited the defendant into committing the lewd act. After initial resistance to the proposition, the defendant was later pressured with persistent and aggressive provocation.

We at the Law Offices of Jeff Voll understand the process the prosecution must go through to gain a conviction, and we know how to fight to avoid one at each juncture. We can appeal to the District Attorney's office for the case to be rejected. If that fails, we work for a dismissal at the trial or for a plea bargain that reduces the charge to a lesser offense like trespassing or disturbing the peace. We will fight particularly hard against the additional charge of indecent exposure since that would force lifelong sex offender registration. Finally, our expert lewd conduct defense attorneys will obtain police records and other evidences, closely examine state witnesses, search for witnesses to testify in your favor, and do everything possible to win your case.

Related Offenses

Five closely related offenses that might come up in a lewd conduct case are as follows:

Indecent Exposure (PC 314): This charge concerns willingly exposing one's genitals to public view for gratification, arousal, or offense. It does not pertain to the buttocks nor to breasts, but a conviction would require sex offender registration.
Loitering In/Near a Public Restroom to Commit or Solicit Lewd Conduct or Another Illegal Act (PC 647d): This charge is a misdemeanor that specifically targets bathroom areas since lewd conduct so often occurs in such places.
Trespassing (PC 602): If the defendant illegally entered private property or ignored no trespassing and no loitering signs, the charge could be reduced to criminal trespassing. This charge can be a misdemeanor or a mere infraction, which does not create a criminal record.
Disturbing the Peace (PC 415): Some pleas bring the allegations down to only disturbing the peace. Since lewd behavior can disturb and offend others, there is a connection.
Lewd Acts With a Minor (PC 288): If lewd acts were done to a minor, it is counted as child molestation. Both touching the child's sex organs and inciting him/her to touch the adult's are included. Any sexual touching, through the clothes or directly on the skin is included. This is a felony count and carries punishments ranging from probation to life imprisonment for certain repeat offenders. Sentencing is harsher if the child was under 14, mistaking the child's age is not an admissible defense, and sex offender registration is mandatory.
Peeking While Loitering or Unlawful (647 i & j): This is California's "peeping Tom law." It is a lewd behavior of sorts and is classified as disorderly conduct. Lewd Conduct itself is also a sub-classification of disorderly conduct. Peeking is done secretly, violates privacy rights, and sometimes involves secret photography. Six months in jail, probation, and a $1,000 fine are possible punishments.

Expert Lewd Conduct Defense Attorneys

If you have been accused of committing lewd conduct or other sex crimes like rape, indecent exposure, prostitution, sexual assault, and sexual battery in the Los Angeles area, we have the resources to defend you. Jeff Voll is skilled at defending these types of cases and knows how to defeat sex crimes allegations by the prosecution. Legal niche experts, researchers, investigators, and more also boost the effectiveness of our defense team. Contact us today at 323-467-6400, and we will put our knowledge and experience to work for you. Remember that Attorney Jeff Voll is the ONLY California criminal defense firm that can truthfully state he achieved over 100 case dismissals in one 12 month period. Look no further for an attorney to represent you or a loved one.

Lewd Conduct